Resolution of the Long Conflict in Papua for Equitable National Development

Abdul Chasib

doi:10.55960/jlri.v12i1.566

Abdul Chasib Professional Expert in Strategy at Lemhannas RI, Jakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v12i1.566

Keywords: Social Resilience, Social Justice, Community-Based Security, Sustainable Development, Papua

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyse efforts to resolve the Papua conflict to achieve equitable national development, focusing on the role of Special Autonomy (OTSUS) policies, local leaders' involvement, and community-based security strategies.

Study Design/Methodology/Approach: Using a qualitative approach through a comprehensive literature review, this study adopts the theoretical frameworks of Social Resilience and Sustainable Development, identifying factors that influence social stability in Papua. Data was drawn from previous studies, policy document analysis, and relevant theories to explore bureaucratic challenges, unequal access to public services, and the significant role of local customary and religious leaders in strengthening social cohesion.

Findings: The findings indicate that the OTSUS policy has yet to succeed in improving the quality of life for the people of Papua, particularly in remote areas. Bureaucratic factors, weak law enforcement, and overlapping regulations hinder social integration and increase the community's dependence on external aid. Integrating local customary and religious leaders in development project planning and oversight has proven to increase community acceptance, reduce conflict, and strengthen local resilience. Additionally, community intelligence-based security strategies and effective use of social media are essential to counter separatist propaganda.

Originality/Value: This study highlights the importance of a culturally grounded, collaborative approach to building social and economic resilience in Papua, offering a new perspective on sustainable development strategies relevant to regions with similar conflict dynamics.

References

Ambadar, J. (2013). CSR dalam Praktik di Indonesia. Elex Media Komputindo.

Ayuni, Q., Arsil, F., & Febriyanto, S. A. (2024). Shifting Approach to Handling the Papua Conflict in Indonesia. Contempt. Readings L. & Soc. Just., 16, 236.

Bossel, H. (1999). Indicators for sustainable development: theory, method, applications. International Institute for Sustainable Development Winnipeg.

Chauvel, R., & Bhakti, I. (2004). The Papua Conflict: Jakarta’s Perceptions and Policies. In Policy Studies (Issue 5).

Dasgupta, P. (2007). Measuring sustainable development: theory and application. Asian Development Review, 24(01), 1–10.

Hadi, A. (2021). The Dynamics of Ethnonationalism and Conflict Resolution in Papua. MUHARRIK: Jurnal Dakwah Dan Sosial, 4(02), 267–282.

Kaisupy, D. A., & Maing, S. G. (2021). Proses negosiasi konflik papua: dialog Jakarta-Papua. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(1), 82–98.

Karseno. (2011). Dinamika Politik Indonesia Dalam Perjuangan Diplomasi Pembebasan Irian Barat, 1949-1963. Jurnal Sejarah CITRA LEKHA, XV(1), 56–65. https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/cilekha/article/view/3415

Keck, M., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). What is social resilience? Lessons learned and ways forward. Erdkunde, 5–19.

Laia, K. (2022). Liputan Khusus: Catatan Pelanggaran HAM di Tanah Papua Pada 2021. Https://Betahita.Id/News/Lipsus/7170/Catatan-Pelanggaran-Ham-Di-Tanah-Papua-Pada-2021.Html?V=1645599746, 2021, 1–2.

Marnelly, T. R. (2012). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): Tinjauan teori dan praktek di Indonesia. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis, 2(2), 49–59.

Mollet, J. A. (2011). The dynamics of contemporary local-government policies and economic development in West Papua. Development in Practice, 21(2), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2011.543273

Mukhtadi, M. (2021). Strategi Pemerintah Dalam Penanganan Gerakan Separatis Papua Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Diplomasi Pertahanan Indonesia (Government Strategies in Managing Papua Separatist Movement and Its Implications on Defense Diplomacy). Jurnal Diplomasi Pertahanan, 7(2), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.33172/jdp.v7i2.729

Pellokila, J. R. Z. (2021). Analisis Penyelesaian Konflik Hak Ulayat pada Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Kabupaten Jayapura Papua. Jurnal Syntax Transformation, 2(08), 1111–1123. https://doi.org/10.46799/jst.v2i8.330

Rohim, N. (2014). Optimalisasi Otonomi Khusus Papua dalam Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Guna Meredam Konflik dan Kekerasan. Jurnal Fiat Justisia, 8(1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v8no1.289

Ryan, N. (2021). Penyelesaian Konflik di Papua Perlu Pendekatan Kolaboratif. Https://Nasional.Kompas.Com/Read/2021/05/06/22215011/Penyelesaian-Konflik-Di-Papua-Perlu-Pendekatan-Kolaboratif, 1–2.

Safril, A., Wardahni, A., Ponsela, D. F., & Tsauro, M. A. (2016). Problem Dasar Kesenjangan Digital di Asia Tenggara. Jurnal Global Dan Strategis Universitas Airlangga, 10(2), 204–220.

Seda, F. S. S. E., Setyawati, L., Pera, Y. H. T., Febriani, R., & others. (2018). Social policies, social exclusion & social well-being in Southeast Asia: A case study of Papua, Indonesia. Economics & Sociology, 11(3), 147–160.

Tanati, D., & Palenewen, J. Y. (2024). Penyelesaian Konflik Agraria Pada Masyarakat Adat Papua. https://repository.penerbitwidina.com/publications/567839 /penyelesaian-konflik-agraria-pada-masyarakat-adat-papua

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945, 1 (1945). https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/fulltext/1945/UUDTAHUN~1945UUD.HTM

Otonomi Khusus Bagi Provinsi Papua, 1 (2001). https://jdih.kemenkeu.go.id/fulltext/2008/35tahun2008

UU RI No.35. (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 35 Tahun 2008 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang nomor 21 Tahun 2001 Tentang Otonomi Khusus Bagi Provinsi Papua Menjadi Undang-Undang. Republik Indonesia, 1, 5.