The Shadow State Narrative, Bureaucratic Politics, and National Resilience in the Trump Era

Main Article Content

Fahlesa Munabari
Margaretha Hanita
Abdul Rivai Ras

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between the first term of the Trump administration (2017–2021) and the United States Intelligence Community (USIC), with particular attention to intelligence politicisation, bureaucratic politics, and the deployment of the “deep state” narrative. The authors argue that these dynamics are changing patterns of democratic governance and impacting the national resilience of the United States in the realms of politics, government, and security.


Study Design/Methodology/Approach: This study adopted a qualitative approach to analyze the implementation of inter-institutional competition, while a national resilience framework based on the Asta Gatra framework was used to assess the interaction between political authority, administrative integrity, and security governance.


Findings: Persistent distrust, populist rhetoric, and political intervention characterise the relations between President Trump and the Intelligence Community. These dynamics weakened analytical independence, institutional coordination, and transparency, thereby disrupting the balance between political and administrative resilience and constraining the state’s adaptive capacity in managing national security under political turbulence.


Originality/Value: This study contributes to the literature by integrating bureaucratic politics and national resilience perspectives to reinterpret the Trump-Intelligence Community conflict as a test of institutional resilience, rather than a conspiracy phenomenon.

Article Details

How to Cite
Munabari, F., Hanita, M., & Ras, A. R. (2025). The Shadow State Narrative, Bureaucratic Politics, and National Resilience in the Trump Era. Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 13(3), 336-350. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v13i3.1239
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Margaretha Hanita, Universitas Indonesia

National Resilience Program, Graduate School of Sustainable Development, University of Indonesia

Abdul Rivai Ras, Universitas Indonesia

National Resilience Program, Graduate School of Sustainable Development, Universitas Indonesia

References

Allison, G. T., & Halperin, M. H. (1972). Bureaucratic politics: A paradigm and some policy implications. World Politics, 24(S1), 40-79.
Anderson, B. (2015). What kind of thing is resilience? Politics, 35(1), 60-66.
Bauer, M. W., Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2021). Pathways to administrative resilience: Public bureaucracies ruled by democratic backsliders as a transnational challenge.
Bendor, J., & Moe, T. M. (1985). An adaptive model of bureaucratic politics. American Political Science Review, 79(3), 755-774. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956842
Clifford, J. G. (1990). Bureaucratic politics. The Journal of American History, 77(1), 161-168.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). Sage publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=335ZDwAAQBAJ
Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. (2017). Organizational resilience in national security bureaucracies: Realistic and practicable? Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 25(4), 341-349. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12164
Davis, J. (2006). Intelligence analysts and policymakers: Benefits and dangers of tensions in the relationship. Intelligence and National Security, 21(6), 999–1021. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684520601046325
Degaut, M. (2016). Spies and policymakers: Intelligence in the information age. Intelligence and National Security, 31(4), 509-531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02684527.2015.1017931
Demiroz, F. (2025). The Origins and Intellectual Structure of the Deep State Literature. Public Administration Review, 85(6), 1666-1681. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70040
Gentry, J. A. (2021). Trump-Era Politicization: A Code of Civil--Intelligence Behavior Is Needed. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 34(4), 757-786. https://doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2021.1960252
Gookins, A. J. (2008). The role of intelligence in policy making. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 28(1), 65–73.
Graham T. Allison. (2007). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods.
Halperin, M. H., & Clapp, P. (2007). Bureaucratic politics and foreign policy. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Hellinger, D. C. (2019). The deep state, hegemony, and democracy. In Conspiracies and Conspiracy Theories in the Age of Trump (pp. 221-274). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98158-1_7
Horwitz, R. B. (2022). Trump and the “deep state.” In The Trump Administration (pp. 41–58). Routledge.
Jervis, R. (2010). Why intelligence and policymaker clash. Political Science Quarterly, 125, 185.
Leonnig, C. D., Harris, S., & Jaffe, G. (2018). Breaking with tradition, Trump skips written intelligence report for oral briefings. The Washington Post; The Washington Post.
Lowenthal, M. M. (2025). Intelligence: From secrets to policy. CQ press.
McCann, D. (2019). The deep state’s contempt for democracy. Quadrant, 63(12), 36-40.
Mclaughlin, J. E. (2021). Four Phases of Former President Trump’s Relations with the Intelligence Community. International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence, 34(4), 787-794.
Moynihan, D. P. (2020). Populism and the deep state: The attack on public service under Trump. Available at SSRN 3607309.
Stevenson, J. (2021). Whistle-blowers, Wokeness and the CIA. Survival, 63(5), 235-246.
Syadzily, T. A. H. (2025). An Examination of Pesantren Regulatory Policy within the Framework of National Resilience. Jurnal Lemhannas RI, 13(2), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.55960/jlri.v13i2.1099
Welsh, M. (2014). Resilience and responsibility: governing uncertainty in a complex world. The Geographical Journal, 180(1), 15-26.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.

DB Error: Unknown column 'Array' in 'WHERE'